Wednesday, 22 June 2016
For a guy who is being stalked, investigated and harassed, why is this jackass still around? I guess $5,000 isn't enough for this bullshit artist. If his brain dead groupies can't see this now, they deserve to lose their retirement money.
I am listening and watching Nathan Garn's latest televangelist worthy scam of a video on YouTube and this boy has gained some confidence once he conned his way to a new FLIR camera. He is trying to present something that isn't a new idea. Nathan has gone in to hiding in a private Facebook group so he isn't bothered by people who have serious questions for him. His groupies can be groomed with no outside interference. Mr. Cult leader can tend to his flock of drooling morons unimpeded. He can hook them with all sorts of bullshit evidence and have nobody keep him in check.
If you haven't watched his latest vid, I will post it here. I refuse to link to that fucktard's channel so I'll host it here.
I'm listening to this bullshit and I'm laughing. Really laughing. Nathan is getting his fans involved and he wants them to do his leg work for him. He needs a team and he sprinkles a dose of humanity on his steaming pile of diaper filled excrement so everyone can sit around and do a clap for him and nod approvingly at each other.
Hoaxers come and go but it looks like Mr. Garn wants to hang around and pick up the loose change off the ground. He can see that there are a few dollars to be made in Bigfootland if one has the right schtick. First, Nathan Reo Garn, or Ashton Garn or Guy or whatever the fuck his real name is, has barely been around. He knows nothing about Bigfootland.
He has modeled himself after that guy who rides around city parks and pretends to be a Bigfoot researcher. Utah takes a lot of Jimbergiant's subtleties and molds them to formulate his own character. It's so obvious that I don't know how people can't see it.
I almost choked on my beer when he said Bigfoot are cute friendly creatures. Or fun. Or something like that. How the hell would Mr. No Fucking Evidence know that? Here's a clue for you. If clowns like Squatchmaster, Timbergiant and now Nathan Garn, find Bigfoot evidence everythime they go out, you know they are full of shit. That's a guarantee. I watched Nathan's videos before he got all crybaby butthurt and hid them in his safe place.
He's had a taste of the gullibility of people who will mail him their hard earned dough without asking so much as a question. He got his new fancy FLIR camera so the fucker better use it. And use it every fucking night. I remember when Jim got his $2,500 camera. It lasted for one video because Jim apparently didn't know how to operate it.
I can't be the only one who sees where this is going. Nathan fancies himself to be a film maker. He doesn't know Bigfoot or the inner workings well enough, so he is picking the brains of those who do.
I'm willing to bet that he will ask for more money or try to squeeze more funds in to his already posted campaign. Not sure when that gong show expires. I don't really give a shit what people do with their money. They can waste it on lottery tickets or they can waste it on Mr. Chiclet's.
What I do give a shit about is a predator preying on weak minded people. I give a shit that he makes a mockery of a subject that some of us take seriously.If Garn wants to be a film maker or get his face on T.V., he should just say it. Quit being a fucking poser.
I think Nathan Reo Garn is a scam artist. He wants to make documentaries or television worthy programs. Maybe he'd be happy with being a YouTube star. Who knows. My gut instinct is seldom wrong and it twists and turns when Reo speaks. I can see right through this twit.
He wants your money and he wants you to do his work for him. Wake the fuck up.
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
This screenshot has caused a lot of discussion in the Bigfoot world. Some people think it's a real Bigfoot and others, like me, think it's simply pareidolia. I will do my best to show why I think this is nothing more than shadows, leaves and twigs.
Before I get started, I want to say that I do not think Robert Dodson is a hoaxer. I think he is a sincere and hard working guy who thinks he caught a Bigfoot on camera. I do, however, think he is mistaken.
I have watched this video over twenty times and I also zoomed in on the area this face is supposed to be. The video is a bit lengthy for such a short clip. The first section of the video shows a clip from Robert's video played at regular speed. The second part is inverted and last is a zoomed in clip of the same location. For me, it was the zoomed in video clip that confirmed to me that what we see is not a Bigfoot face.
Here is the clip with the audio removed.
Instead of cherry picking one still image from the video, I will present some that were taken by me and some that were taken by other people who are having a discussion in a Facebook group.
The above screenshots don't show a clear face in my opinion with the exception of the last one but that is still a stretch of the imagination.
Likewise, in the screenshots below, I do not see a face that holds a consistent shape throughout the portion of the video clip in question.
Even for an alleged juvenile or toddler Bigfoot, this face is is very small compared to the leaves in the foreground. Also, if this is a young Bigfoot in such close proximity to a noisy human, where is the mother or father? Why didn't Robert see it? It was only mere feet in front of him.
I give my interpretation of what I saw in the video. The "face" is an illusion created by shadows, foreground leaves and some twigs.
Same location but a slightly different camera angle. A little up and to your right is a tree trunk. I don't see anything that resembles a primate's face.
This screenshot shows the same spot without the red square.
These last two screenshots show a closer look and also show shadows, leaves and foliage, in my opinion.
The screenshot originally shown in one of Robert's video really gave no explanation, no context and no time stamp that the "face" was captured. The complete lack of information regarding this image, as I viewed it in his other video is a bit frustrating. I had to dig and ask Robert questions about the video, and to his credit he was quick to reply with some answers.
There are those who have put their seal of approval on this video but I haven't seen any serious breakdown or analysis. I certainly don't consider my analysis to be in depth and exhaustive but it does show why I am holding the position that I have. I do not see the face of a Bigfoot in this video clip.
This image below clearly shows the face of a gorilla. It is undeniable.
If an image of this quality was shown in Robert's video, I may have a different opinion.
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
Remember on my last blog when I said that Kelly was a detriment to himself? Well, he's gone and stuck his big foot in his big fat crybaby mouth again. The fucking baby just can't man up and admit when he was wrong. He has to blame someone else.
Jelly Jaw was hoaxed by some fun loving folks hoaxing a video. Normally hoaxes bother me but this particular one was so obviously not a bigfoot because it was just a dark blip on the screen.
I have linked to the video because I want this guy to make some money because of the grief Kelly Shaw is causing him. Be kind and click the video.
Shaw is crying because he spent money to go to the location and check it out. He wanted to be the bigshot, first on the scene, so that's his problem. Nobody told him to pack up and go there. I never heard Jack and Jeff cry when they were hoaxed by those two kids. I never heard them cry when it came to being duped...many times.
Poor old jabber jaw has his panties in a bunch now because he made an ass of himself and we are all laughing at him. He's blaming the people that made the bigfoot video and Shaw wants his pound of flesh.
Kelly Shaw is whining like a bitch and he claims to have filed a complaint with the FAA against the guy with the Bigfoot video. The FAA assured Kelly? Really now? Shaw is known to lie a lot when things don't go his way. He's a bully and a thin skinned fucking pansy. If I bitched like he did my old man, RIP, would have slapped me silly.
Shaw is a hypocrite, and a bitch. Don't forget bitch. I wonder if Mr. Bitch has his commercial pilot license for drones. If he does, he should produce it. How come Kelly can make monetized videos using his drone and hardpack101 can not? There is no law against using a drone to make a hoax video.
I visited the halfwit's channel and found a few interesting videos.
Look at that. Monetized drone videos. Fucking hypocrite. Crybaby bitch. Kelly Shaw needs to suck it up and put on his big boy pants. He should take it on the chin, man up, and just admit he was duped. It would likely have been less painful in the long run.
The problem with Shaw's alleged complaint is...well...it seems to be full of shit. A big huge pile of shit. Either Shaw is lying, which has been proven several times in the past, or the person he spoke to at the FAA is just as incompetent as Shaw.
My friend S,teve Alcorn, posted this in the Coalition group on Facebook, so I thank him for this information.
Model Aircrraft Operations <<<Link
Judging from hardpack101's video, he seems to be within the guidelines mentioned above.
Once again, it looks like hardpack101 is within the law. His video was made for shits and giggles. So what if it's monetized? (Click his video). His video is for recreation. It's not like he was hired to take aerial shots of the Empire State Building for Architect Digest or some other magazine. THAT would be for commercial use. Nobody hired hardpack101 to make a hoax video.
Kelly Shaw just needs to shut his big lying yap. His big mouth gets his dumb ass in to trouble every time. He's a baby and a bully. Nothing more. Oh. He's a lying hypocrite as well.
If I got a dollar for every time I was threatened with the law, I could buy a fancy Starbuck's coffee. Not that I'd want to buy their overpriced shitty coffee though. I'll take Tim's any day. Double double.
Monday, 13 June 2016
I am sitting here drinking a beer and I am almost at a loss for words. The sheer stupidity of this is almost beyond comprehension for the truly sane, critical thinkers. It's poetic and funny...very funny. On the inside I'm laughing so hard that my side truly hurts.
An alleged Bigfoot video popped up on YouTube recently and when I saw it, I immediately thought it was a hoax. A few too many red flags for my tastes but what do I know, I'm not an expert like some of the asshats in Bigfootland like Kelly Shaw, faker of the weasel photo...I mean Marten photo. That in itself was a gong show. Shaw has already proven himself to be a liar. Incompetent twatwaffle is only one step away.
As evidenced below, Kelly Shaw is a liar, and possibly a bit of an idiot. He was butthurt with the Bluff Creek Project so he had to make shit up in order to get even.
How do we know he was lying? Below is the truth, right from the photographer.
Today is one of those days where blogging becomes an absolute joy for me. I enjoy it more and more with every key stroke. I'm still laughing and can't stop.
Anyway, back to the alleged Bigfoot video. Here is the original video that brings us to the shit show of today.
Next up is the "follow up" by Mr. fucking know-it-all. Mr. "my dead fallen tree is a Bigfoot". Mr. "my 40 ft. tall shadow in the trees is a Bigfoot". Left to his own devices, Mr. stump hunter can become a severe detriment to himself. Like today for example.
I could only skim through this video because Kelly is embarrassing himself so badly. I saw nothing in the video that clearly resembled a primate-like footprint. An impression in the ground is NOT proof of anything and nothing was ruled out. Must be Bigfoot.
I am a member in a group that takes a lot of shit from people who think we are raining on their parade. That's not the case at all. It's called evaluating the evidence and coming to a rational conclusion based on where the evidence takes us. In this case, and many others like it, this one screamed hoax.
The subject was so small and the clarity of the screenshot was so poor that this "Bigfoot" is inconclusive at best.
Some people get butthurt when their cognitive dissonance is messed with. Voicing any objective opinions are frowned upon. Logic gets you blocked. Rational thinking gets you labeled a troll.
Want some cheese with that whine?
Kelly Shaw the bigshot found "so much Bigfoot evidence", according to the above nonsense. How the fuck would he know what is Bigfoot evidence? Apparently Shaw doesn't know anything as it relates to Bigfoot. His video is glaring proof of that. He sees things that are not there. Here is the video that proves that.
Golly gee-whiz, would ya look at that. A video that confirms what we have been saying from the start.
Shaw even ignored Dr. Meldrum.
More importantly, this video shows us that we shouldn't believe everything we see. Proof is needed to confirm anything that might be a Bigfoot. A crappy video, blurry pictures and subjective opinions are not proof or facts. Neither one prove the existence of Bigfoot.
I wonder how Mr. jabber jaw will 'splain away this one.
EDIT TO ADD:
EDIT AGAIN TO ADD:
The guy planted evidence? Sure he did. Liar.
Sunday, 12 June 2016
It has been quite awhile since I have blogged about anything of interest. That loud mouthed buffoon, Kelly Shaw is still out there swiping sightings reports from the BFRO and then parroting the finding on his YouTube channel so he can buy new props for his drone.
Apparently, and unaware to me, there is a new kid in town. He goes by Utah Sasquatch but his name is allegedly Nathan Reo but I did find another person by a similar name. Nathan Reo Garn, but more about that later.
I watched this kid's videos a couple of times and just chalked him up to being another self deluded stump hunter and shadow chaser. He reminds me of Timbergiant in obvious and subtle ways. A good looking charmer that the camera seems to like. After watching his videos a few more times the similar subtleties started to emerge.
Like Timbergiant, Reo will plant seeds in the minds of his viewers as he's making his videos. He questions himself much like Timbergiant does. This lends an air of credibility among his viewers. There are many other subtle things but I won't get in to all of that. I hope people look for these clues on their own. I also find him to be a tad bit misleading. Nonetheless, his gullible fan base gobble all of it up, including Christopher Noel. The same Christopher Noel that believed Hank the Bigfoot was real. Nuff said there. I wonder if Yale has asked for its diploma back yet.
I have not seen the following video...or maybe I have. If I did, it was probably one of those videos where you roll your eyes, laugh, and wonder why anyone would believe the claims made in it.
I would post a link to the video but Mr. Utah made the video private. I can't stand thin skinned crybabies like him. The first time they get called out, they need to run to their safe space and make long explanation videos as to why they hid all of their videos. Funny, all the hoaxers do that too. Hmmm...
I'll get back to this video in a moment. To be honest, I laughed this guy off until I found out that not only did he start a GoFundMe campaign, he already has over $5,000 donated by some gullible rubes.
According to Reo he needs $20,000 to buy a camera or ten. 20K is a shit load of money, especially money for a hobby. I personally think that if a "researcher" is going to solicit for money they should at least have 1.) some of their own equipment funded by them. 2.) very good evidence to justify the need for the equipment. Reo has none of that. He has charm and a smile, big fucking deal. Show me something more than a dark blip in a video.
This is reminiscent of Timbergiant again. Remember when TGBF was gifted a $2,500 video camera? Ask Jimbergiant where it is now.
I am by no mean rich but I have funded all of my own equipment. I saved and purchased a great, used camcorder for $850, which was half the going price.
It records in 1080p, 1080i and everything below that. It records up to 60fps and does time lapse. I can take high quality photos with it. The camera also feature FULL manual controls and I believe that is vital when you need to zoom in. It allows you to focus in on the subject you want.
It comes dual XLR ports for superior audio recording and both channels can be adjusted manually. She is a heavy beast but manageable for an amateur like me.
So, I ask myself, WHY would an amateur Bigfooter with zero evidence need $20,000 for a camera?
Even a broadcast quality camera won't run that much. Maybe $5,000 or under would get you a good used camera like that. For YouTube videos almost any HD camcorder will work well.
Maybe he needs a thermal camera. Oh wait. I bought the Seek Thermal for my phone for $200. FLIR makes a thermal now that is around the $600 mark.
Maybe he needs a good digital camera. Oh....I paid $149 for my Kodak that shoot at 14megapixels. Again, it's not high end but it produces good, clear images.
Maybe he wants 35mm film cameras because you know, it's difficult to manipulate film photographs. While that may be true, the alleged subjects can be fabricated.
I have three 35mm film cameras, each with their own lens and that totaled about $200 and includes a carrying case. The cameras are mechanical and require no batteries to take pictures. They only power the light meter. A stand alone light meter can be bought for $5. I have one of those as well.
I have some crappy audio recorders and some crappy night vision that doesn't amount to much. By my calculations, I have spent approximately $1,500 in recording gear. I have equipment accessories and a few other cameras. Even if I spent $2,000, it's a far cry from the $20K that Reo wants and there is not a thing wrong with the gear I have. I could use a sweet audio recorder or great parabolic microphone but it's not in the cards right now.
My point is that Nathan Reo has committed no investment to his research. No cameras and nothing to show. I have recorded a couple of things I find interesting but I don't use that as leverage to ask for funds for other gear.
He has no detailed mission statement. The people donating get nothing for their money except a big white toothed smile.
There are people who are homeless and people who are hungry and this clown is asking for $20,000 so he can support his hobby and ego. Do golfers set up GoFundMe campaigns for a new set of golf clubs? Fuck no.
At least make an effort to get some gear. Any gear. A cell phone doesn't cut it.
Okay. I took a couple of days off for the smoke to clear before I continued with this blog post.
I am usually quite hard on people who lie and/or hoax but I really want to like Nathan and I want to believe that he is above board. I watched his 'Bread Crumbs' video which has been removed, just like the rest of his other videos. That right there is a red flag. His body language was a red flag.
A word of advice to Reo. If you have very thin skin, Bigfooting is not for you.
My biggest jaw drop was when Nathan, with a straight face, repeatedly lied about his knowledge with regards to video and audio editing. Either he lied about not knowing video editing or he lied about his resume on his linked in profile, which he conveniently deleted.
My laptop was acting up so I used a screen recorder to capture his profile. I had a feeling he would delete his Linkedin. All hoaxers delete shit so this isn't looking good for Utah Sasquatch.
I have to ask WHY would Nathan scrub his YouTube channels (yes, plural) and his Linkedin? He has two other channels unrelated to Bigfoot that he cleaned up.
Why go through all the hassle of deleting his internet presence when he could just jump in a group and answer questions like he said he would, or could do? This seems like the crybaby way out and it doesn't seem to be the first time he ran to his safe place after being questioned.
I want to believe this guy but he is making it extremely difficult. Pulling posts, deleting comments, profiles and videos do not give him any credibility in my opinion. It's like he has something to hide. He can always say "I never said that" and his groupies would likely believe him. I know what I heard and saw in his Bread Crumb video. I bet he saw the same things upon reviewing it and decided that it didn't work in his favour. He is a counselor and alleged Psycho Therapist/Tech, so I'm sure he knows how to be convincing to his fans. The sympathy card and long drawn out explanations didn't cut it for me. Perhaps he needs more acting lessons.
If Nathan Reo doesn't want to be questioned or critiqued, he shouldn't be in Bigfooting and he shouldn't ask for $20,000 for a thermal camera. Any results would be inconclusive anyway.