Sunday, 1 February 2015

Who is Thinker Thunker?

This is a blog post I have been wanting to do for awhile because I am growing weary of hoax enablers, sensationalists, and fabricators of information.

In my opinion, Thinker Thunker has turned in to one of those individuals. I used to be a fan of his videos because I thought he was providing some good breakdowns for questionable videos.
  It seemed like his motives changed over night. Instead of well thought out breakdowns and good observations, his videos have turned in to "everything is a Bigfoot" kind of mentality. I was noticing that Thinker Thunker was revisiting Bigfoot videos that had already been deemed hoaxes by the majority of people in Bigfootland.

I will provide some examples for you.

First up is a screenshot from the IMAX video which allegedly shows a Bigfoot. If I am not mistaken, the subject shown in the video was later reported to be a crew member on an ATV or BMX bike.


In his description, Thinker Thunker goes for the sensational approach and explains why this can NOT be a human.




Then we have the 'Big Red' videos recorded by Timbergiant. In Jim's video, he records something but it's difficult to determine what it is. Some people say it's a dog and others say it's a costume. I am going with the latter on this because I think Timbergiant presents questionable videos. He is either a hoaxer or the luckiest Bigfoot researcher of all time. The man has videos of at least three Bigfoot, multiple videos of foot prints and he has collected evidence, only to be "accidentally" destroyed by TGBF himself.
  According to Thinker, not only is this a Bigfoot, but it's carrying a baby. You can't get more sensational than that.



Next there is the Bigfoot in the giant Sequoias. This video has been proven to be a documentary done by Shawn Bannon, yet Think Thunker still tries to get some mileage out of it by claiming this is a real Bigfoot.


This might be intriguing to someone who is new to the Bigfoot community so I'm sure Thinker Thunker is playing on this for channel hits. Thinker spends a lot of time on his videos but he can't research this to find out it's actually not a Bigfoot? His actions are irresponsible and he is blatantly misrepresenting this particular piece of footage.









There is also the Siberian Bigfoot which was later confirmed to be a hoax by Igor Burstev. Thinker Thunker presented this creature as real and carrying a baby as well.



This screen shot contradicts Thinker Thunker.





The last straw for me was recently. Thinker Thunker took an innocent video of Buffalo and hiker/skiers and turned it in to a Bigfoot video.



 Thinker has presented complete and utter bullshit with this latest "breakdown". His methods are flawed. Sure, he has a cool voice and fancy software but shit is shit. Spritzing it with perfume won't change it.

If you want a much better and realistic breakdown, I suggest you visit Snow Walker's channel or ParaBreakdown's channel. Both men give a more realistic and sane explanation of what occurred in this video.

Breakdown by Snow Walker



ParaBreakdown video



With so much big shittery going on with Thinker Thunker, I decided to have a look around to see if I could find a reason for his motivations of presenting such  sensationalistic crap.

It didn't take long before I believed I had my answers.











"So far I have over 1,300,000 views on Youtube with well over 9,000 subscribers. I'm not exactly a household name, but it's a nice start.

(I use CGI software to examine and investigate paranormal videos.) People LOVE this stuff! :) And it all ties in with my last script (a paranormal thriller,) which happens to be the 1st script I want to shoot. And at least now, I have an active, hungry audience waiting for new projects)"

I have no issues with Mr. White being an entertainer or making money from entertaining. What I have an issue with, is Thinker Thunker making money off his videos by misleading people. He is knowingly creating false information in order to drive traffic to his channel and videos.
   
In my opinion he is no different than any other hoaxer, snake oil salesman or bullshit artist. He should no longer be allowed to ride on the backs of people who are interested in the subject of Bigfoot. He does the community a disservice and it's a slap in the face of those who take this subject seriously.

The man should not be taken seriously when it comes to his breakdown videos of anything related to the subject of Bigfoot.

139 comments:

  1. Kind of scummy. Not your article, but the way he was talking about this subscribers like they were cattle, or worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yea I agree, I quite liked some of Randy's videos, but it seems most people who post have really big egos, so what makes him different or any better than the people he criticizes? Well your guess is as good as mind. In many ways youtube reminds me of a pyramid scheme - the person ahead of the curve wins everyone else loses their money.

      Delete
  2. Great post ...the guy is a clown

    ReplyDelete
  3. I used to like thinker...but his bigfoot bison video made me laugh. ..
    If I'm not mistaken. ..there is a wooden boardwalk on the path that the 4 bigfoot bare walking on...not 100% sure..
    Plus...those bigfeets are awfully thin...
    Just think if a pro wrestler is 7 feet tall and 400 pounds...and a gorilla is 5.5 feet tall and the same weight. ..an 8 foot tall man ape could be 900 pounds..all these hoaxes show human proportions

    ReplyDelete
  4. His last video of Yellowstone was ridiculous . It was obvious the bigfeet in that video were people, yet he muddies the water by calling them either bigfoots or men in monkey suits, when the quality of the images were so poor and pixilated to begin with that it was stupid to even imply a monkey suit. He is turning into MK Davis, remember his analysis of the Dyer tent video, and the eye blink? Focusing on the bigfoot eye blink, while ignoring the tree eye blink just to the left that happened at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sounds like the Facebook Find Bigfoot crowd at it again. I gave up on the guy long ago when some of the proven hoaxs were given new life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Proven hoaxes by whom?

      Delete
    2. Seriously @ 6:28? Which hoax do you speak of?

      Delete
  6. His previous videos were bad, but the turkey hunter one and this one are embarrassing. It's almost like a bad parody.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, you can clearly see the camo hat on the hunter...Looked good first time I saw it, but clearly hunters.
      I filmed one of my habituation areas on Sat, but it says its still loading??
      Coming soon, just have to figure it out?

      Delete
    2. DS....could you please post a link if you have a Youtube channel with video's uploaded.
      I would like to check it out if possible?

      Delete
    3. Whomever mentioned the Turkey Hunter one above that really chapped my ass. It was beyond clearly a group of hunters. And good job to Merchant dealing with the Bison deal. When you come out of the woods after 28 days of freezing your ass off this kind of stuff really does kinda piss you off. Thanks to you all for at least keeping it real and grounded. M

      Delete
    4. Thanks Randy for breaking this "Agent of Deception" wide open. We need more people to be vocal about this type of action that seems to be all over the you tube channels.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  7. Only Bigfooting can attract parasites like this, I'm glad someone finally took the time to look into TT, he needed to be exposed.

    Randy, have you ever had a Bigfoot sighting or experience?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have not had my own sighting but I keep looking.
      I once had a wood knock reply but I can't confirm what did it.

      Delete
    2. What else would respond to a tree knock?

      Delete
    3. Vegas, how far was your sighting from Blairsville?

      Delete
    4. Randy, thanks for the response, keep up the good work. Looking forward to this site taking off.

      DS, about 3 hrs. away.

      Delete
    5. Randy Photojonez HeagneyFebruary 12, 2015 4:12 am

      There seems to be a commonality with these hoaxers. They all seem to fancy themselves as Filmmakers, CGI experts, Film Producers, and directors. hmm I wonder why... OH! that's right if their videos go viral they can make a lot of money. Spineless greedy lying loser all of them. None of them like to have any type of constructive dialogue when it come to their videos. There is this guy on Facebook that goes out into the woods researching bigfoot, he was writing on his timeline how he took someone out to his research area. This person in turn starts using this area for his own research, pissing of the guy so much that he stated that this person was worse than a hoaxer for infringing on HIS bigfoot research area!!! really? HOAXERS are public enemy number one when it comes to Bigfoot. If you are on the fence about this, then you really do not have the humanity, or the empathy to see the truth. Because deep down your agenda is all about you, and not about the hidden hominid that wants nothing to do with you.

      Delete
  8. DS ...what would respond to a tree knock...any person in ear shot of the knock could have done it...
    If you are out in the woods...so could other people...maybe even doing the same thing you are...any and that guy thinks a bf knocked first...he knocks back...and so on..
    personally. ..I don't think the range of bigfoot is nation wide...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its possible Thom, but not everyone knows BF tree knock, and a person would have to hurry up and find a strong stick, and a good tree to whack, just not probable. Also depends on how long after Racer knocked did he get a response?
      BF is nationwide! My tree structure videos match other States identically.

      Delete
  9. DS...maybe they match because they are natural...I've seen similar "structures" 10 feet from the highway in an area 1 block outside of the Chicago city limits...
    And as for finding a stick and replying to a knock...well a bigfoot would have to to the same ya know..
    Not saying your evidence is not genuine. ..it's just far from convincing and definitely not proof.
    Now get a bigfoot on film MAKING a structure. ..then you have proof
    Keep looking my friend. ..that's the only way to do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the encouragement. I'm having problems loading my new video,but this area is a small patch of woods, off a highway, with 2 corporate buildings behind the area. In the summer time, this area is so dense, that you can't see the buildings, and none of these people in suits are ever stepping foot in the woods. It would seem an unlikely area for a BF to be, but this area is so abundant with tree markers and breaks (which you'll see someday) it isn't even funny. These are not NATURAL. I would not post a pic as evidence that was made naturally. Please go through my "Far from convincing" evidence, and please tell me which pics you think are naturally made. There must be a ton, since you said it's far from convincing. I'd like to see which ones, you, or anyone else here thinks are natural, and I'd also like to see pics of these "Similar" structures that you speak of.
      Also, BF's usually carry a rock, or a stick, or a branch/fern with them, at all times, or have sticks placed next to the trees where they hang out, or rocks.....this is mainly for protection, and hunting. The tree knocks I've had were within 2-5 seconds after mine, and when I get too close, I get tree knocked ( I didn't see anything move, and pick up a stick) and I've found my share of rock piles, that certainly don't belong where I found them. I had sticks and rocks thrown at me, close range, but could see no movement (you kinda freeze in your shoes, and your eyes are buggin out, so I'm probably not looking around much...but no movement, no noise. I'm getting close to finding them, and it's because I figured out these tree structures. I'd say after 8 years, I'm only 50% in total understanding of their meanings, but the important part is how they mark where the live/feel safe, and THAT, I'm 90% on!

      Delete
    2. When you have densely growing trees...and they fall...which happens often because of erosion of the soil...they fall and get stuck among the trees near to it...I'll take some pics and show you....

      Delete
    3. I agree, but my pics show intelligent placement, not deadfall. And if you disagree, please show me which ones.

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. DS...I'll tell ya...any bigfoot in the Chicago area will be easy to track today...just got 15- 20 inches of soft snow last night...I'm taking my German Shepherd for a walk in them thar woods today...see what I can see...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They rarely leave tracks in snow because it would lead you right to them. Let me know!

      Delete
    2. With 20 inches of snow everywhere for miles and miles and miles. ..how do you not leave tracks??

      Delete
    3. They use the trees to travel if needed, and seldom leave tracks. They may hibernate? Some may migrate to warner areas.

      Delete
    4. 500 pounds critters swinging from tree to tree?

      Delete
    5. Come on DS..you are a doctor.. you know anatomy...there is a reason silver back gorillas don't swing like chimps...

      Delete
    6. Yes Sir, I do know Anatomy very well, in fact I was the one who noticed Dyer's fake doll had a missing interpahlangeal joint in its hand, first real proof we had that it was a fake!
      Look at "Maine Bigfoot" way up in the tree. They definitely use the trees as much as possible in winter.

      Delete
    7. LOL ds is so f'n delusional

      Delete
    8. Quite sane if I say so myself. I 100% realize it sounds crazy, and don't blame you at all for commenting.
      It just pumps me up to prove it more :-)

      Delete
    9. If you are referring to the "Maine sasquatch" video...that is a porcupine in a tree. ..

      Delete
    10. And the limb that the Maine BF is sitting on, is broke at the end = BF marker.
      Ha Mr. Delusional

      Delete
    11. Lol...that tree is at least 3 telephone poles round, and the creature is bigger round than the tree! A porcupine is quite small! The people in video said it lookedl like a monkey, and it did. I've seen the porcupine videos, not a chance! AND THE LIMB WAS BROKE IT WAS SITTING ON....ONLY ONE TOO!

      Delete
    12. I see you have all the answers DS...you the man..
      You know where they are...how they communicate...what their habits are...
      It's like arguing with a vegan or a creationist...they know better..
      Remember, an extraordinary claim...needs extraordinary proof...
      Which no one...including you...have shown

      Delete
    13. I certainly do not have all the answers, just sharing my beliefs/research from what I've ascertained. I will eventually back up all my claims.

      Delete
    14. BTW Thom, I said I'm only 50% knowledgeable about those structures, and 90% in other structures. You made it seem like I'm 110% sure, not the case my friemd, still a lot to learn!

      Delete
    15. DS, get a hold of yourself. The "Bigfoot" sitting way up in the tree is a porcupine. I remember that video.
      I took several screen shots and lightened the pictures. They clearly show a PORCUPINE. It's a porcupine, not a Bigfoot. Seriously. Proven fact.

      Delete
    16. Explain the big break at the end of the limb it's sitting on? Coincidence, not a chance! That thing is huge Randy, a porcupine is like as big as cat?? I think it was frightened that it just got busted, and the hair appears like quills, but you can't see it's camo face, and you would see a porcupines little face.

      Delete
    17. Can you post these pics?

      Delete
    18. There is nothing to explain. Tree breaks occur all the time. I have a ton of photos of tree breaks, tree bends, etc.
      The fact remains, until you see a Bigfoot arrange branches or break trees, it's all speculation. It's not even good evidence on it's own.

      Here is a link to the many photos of the porcupine-

      https://www.google.ca/search?q=maine+bigfoot+in+a+tree+porcupine&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=blnRVM69BoL4yQTb1YJI&ved=0CB4QsAQ&biw=1525&bih=677&dpr=0.9#imgdii=_

      Delete
    19. Some debunking videos
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEgsTW1jKA0
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjQ_nJZIa-o

      One of these claims to have original video which isn't blurred. Even if you don't agree, I think the other one does a great job showing that it is a porcupine.

      Delete
    20. http://www.phantomsandmonsters.com/2010/01/maine-tree-creaturewhat-is-it.html
      Shows better face shot...Porcupines heads are as big as a baseball! And the body is massive, bigger than the tree it's sitting on......And the tree break it's sitting on....oh the coincidence!
      I guess we'll have to disagree on this one :-)

      Delete
    21. Prime example...
      Randy has shown you a link to a photo that clearly shows a porcupine...you deny it is a porcupine...
      Can't be...the branch is broken...
      Only an 8 foot 500 pound man-ape could possibly be sitting on a broken tree branch..
      As Mr Spock would say to Bones.."Dr, that is illogical."

      Delete
    22. No hes been hanging around that fucktard joe on bigfoot evidence for to long.

      Delete
    23. DS there is no way you can tell how wide that tree is so how can you say its as wide as 3 telephone poles. And as for the branch just because its broken doesn't meen a big foot broke it, for all you know it was infested with bugs and its own wieght snapped it. And what do you meen it was scared because it just got busted, for fucks sake DS do you realize how idiotic you sound some times.

      I use to think hey DS is on a mission to prove something so no big deal he's not hurting anyone, but lately im begining to think you need to seek some help before you hurt yourself.

      You know bro I'm really starting to feel sorry for you.

      Delete
    24. Your sarcasm isn't funny. I saw all of the videos and pics of the porcupine years ago, when they first came out, and the size comparison just isn't there, sorry.

      Delete
    25. How big around do estimate the tree? And the break is a fresh break, no bugs ate it, I think you need to feel sorry for yourself.
      I said I think it was scared, like the hair was standing up when your scared.
      Stop being a douchebag dude, and nit picking what I say.

      Delete
    26. Im not being sarcastic im telling you how I see it.

      If nobody agrees with you we are delusional.

      If we point out were your wrong and offer proof to show you that your wrong you fight it tooth and nail and refuse to admit we are right.

      Ive been to 30 sites to research the porcupine video and every single one admits its a porcupine.

      Your bigfoot pictures not one person on this sight or any other site believes its a bigfoot they all see it for what it is, a bunch of branches and leaves giving the illusion of a face.

      Bro mabey you should take a rest and get your head strait.

      Delete
    27. Its hair is standing strait up like its scared?

      WTF DS you meen like shaggy on Scooby doo. Dude this is reality not a saturday morning cartoon.

      There standing up because there fucking quills on the head of a porcupine.

      Delete
    28. DS, why do you think the people cut the video off where it ended? The object in the tree wasn't going anywhere. Why not get closer to make sure you can identify it if there was a question? Very Suspicious.

      I agree with the other poster. I know you are enthusiastic but the fact that a lot of people disagree so strongly should tell you something.

      Delete
    29. I appreciate the comments. Thom, I've been researching this for awhile, and I put my time in. I only missed one Fri, sat, and sun in the last 2 years, because I was sick. Thom, I NEVER said anyone was delusional for not agreeing with me. You didn't show me ANY proof it was a porcupine, those were opinions, just like mine. I wasn't fighting you tooth and nail either, I said "we will just have to disagree" very polite, didn't attack anyone, I just think its too big to be a porcupine.
      The scared quill appearance was an assumption of course on my part, not stated as fact.
      One of the main reasons people disagree with me, is because this is new to them, they haven't studied ANY of this, yet they act like they know more than me? I'm humble, and just want to share my research with other researchers, so we can prove this to the world. Yeah sometimes my comments are out there it would seem, but in the long run, you'll see I was on to something substantial.

      Delete
    30. DS, take them squatch goggles off

      Delete
    31. New video of one of my research areas! I mention a tunnel in this video, but I didn't walk down to it...I will in part 2. This is the area that I filmed the BF with it's nose on a branch. It's so dense in the summer time, that you can't see the buildings, or houses, but you can now, in the winter time. In the video, I say that I believe this is where the BF live....I meant to say where they hang out in the summer. They have the perimeter marked where the road is, and where they travel.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry680oPrQ4E&feature=youtu.be

      Delete
    32. More sticks...you are the best stick tracker I have ever seen...
      I'm still not convinced it is anything other then sticks broken and tangled naturally...
      How much food can be found in that little patch of woods?? Enough to feed a family of 7 foot tall 500 critters??
      Unless you actually see a bigfoot break a tree limb and place it there...there is no proof that a bigfoot did it...period...

      Delete
    33. That should read "7 foot tall 500 Pound critters"

      Delete
    34. all I see in the video are weather damaged trees. and didn't you say in another post ds something about these sticks not being put up by houses or something?

      Delete
    35. I'm amazed that bigfoot has time to do anything..they appear to take up most of their time beating up trees..
      DS...it seemed that every single broken branch was some sort of marker to you...you pointed out every cracked or fallen tree or tree part as though no other force on earth could have possibly done it other than some giant hominid living in the back yard of some corporate cul-de-sac...

      If a tree falls in the woods and there is no one there to hear it, does it still make a....BIGFOOT DID IT!!!

      Delete
    36. DS is a victim of to many bigfoot tv shows.

      Delete
    37. Naturally tangled LOL....You can't see how all the side markers mark the road and the buildings? Some of the learners could be deadfall, I'll admit that, but you're in denial if you think the perimeter is marked by chance. Thom i'd suggest doing some research of your own, instead of asking me silly questions, and unnecessary childish comments. I didn't say this was their feeding area, I said its where they hang out and feel safe in summer. In the summer there will be tons of new breaks there when they return, and I can compare this footage with the new one. What are you going to say when I'm right? Probably something stupid like I went and did it myself with ladders.

      Delete
    38. so ds if you know they are gonna be hanging out there in the summer right by the road cause they feel safe (LOL) why not put trail cams up and get pics of bigfeet instead of broken twigs after the fact?

      Delete
    39. They would see me putting the camera up for sure! I'm convinced trail cams are useless..all of my cameras have been ripped off, smashed, opened.
      The night vision will be interesting!

      Delete
    40. DS if you are correct. .then I'll be the first to admit it..
      I have done field research. ..for 15 years now...and so far...nothing that couldn't be explained. ..

      Delete
    41. "They would see me putting the camera up for sure!" LOL. ds are you just fucking with us? I mean the stuff you are saying is straight out of lala land. I just cant even have a serious convo with you anymore. im out lol.

      Delete
    42. ds seems to be the kind of person that see's a bigfoot and whatnot wherever he looks. he will walk into a home depot and see a pile of 2x4's and say "hey look, a bigfoot was here and left a marker for other bigfeets to let them know this place is not safe"

      Delete
    43. Fair enough Thom. 15 years of research, you must have a lot to share, I'm always looking to learn more, what can you share?
      Anon 2:12, I'm a Christian, I wouldn't mess around, or mis-lead anyone. A researcher is going to put a trail cam in a squatchy area if their smart. You don't think the BF seem us putting them out? Why do you think we cant get one on trail cam. After several cameras were destroyed, I started hiding them...under logs, in bushes, behind bark on a tree...They found it every time, and either ripped it off, or smashed it into the ground....No way possible they could find these cameras, unless they saw me putting them up! People would have taken the $300 camera...So who or what is finding and destroying my cameras?? DUH!

      Delete
    44. I'm curious what state you live in Thom?

      Delete
    45. ds do you see ghosts too? ill bet they are watching you just like bigfeet is. and I've heard someone use the " im a Christian, I wouldnt lie" line before to, but just cant remember who it was. hmmm..

      Delete
    46. Ghosts are not for Christians, unless it's the Holy Ghost! Yes, you speak of Mr. Dyer, who I exposed teaching a new age Christianity...He's a Satanist as far as I'm concerned.
      I certainly don't have to prove that I'm a Christian, that's obvious to those who've been here for years. I had a lot of enemies on the net when I first introduced my evidence. The Bible says to love your enemies, and that's what I did. They all said that there was a genuineness about me, and some of these enemies, now email me every few days, just to chat. I have no reason to lie, it's hard enough getting people to see the truth, and lying would undermine everything I've worked for...it would all get flushed down the toilet, including my Christianity.

      Delete
    47. I think ds is a bit on the loco side.

      Delete
    48. I think you're a bit on the jealous side.

      Delete
    49. Here's a new video showing what happened to my trail cams.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MFfrZCHwSs

      Delete
    50. LOL that trail cam looked perfectly fine. surely you have bigfeet on it right? or did you just go out and buy one today and lay it down in the snow?

      Delete
    51. That trail cam is about 5 years old, you want the serial #'s so you can check the purchase date? You want me to take the tape off so you can see the cracks? You want me to mail you the camera so you can see the video no longer works? Name it, Mr. Troll...I'll be happy to clear anything up! I'm done with trail cams, you can have it for all I care!

      Delete
    52. that trail cam looks nowhere near "destroyed" as you said and looks perfectly usable. and if something did destroy it so that it no longer works it would have taken pics and saved them on the internal card whether or not actual camera was "destroyed". so you have some good clear bigfoot footage then, no? or did the intelligent beast open it up and eat the card as a Scooby snack? I mean we all know bigfoot watched you the whole time put the camera up so maybe he ninja crawled behind the camera before destroying it so he wouldn't be filmed and yet remain elusive. damn they are smart eh? they seem smarter than most rednecks. if you catch one ds, make sure to give it a SAT test and what not.

      Delete
    53. The camera is not taking video since being rammed into the ground, God's honest truth, not much more I can say about it.

      Delete
    54. How is it that a bigfoot is smart enough to know what a trail cam is...and how to avoid having its photo taken...but needs a marker set by other bigfeets to know to stay off the busy highway?
      As soon as I have time...I'll run over to the nearest forest preserve here in Chicago and take pics of similar sticks and such...just to show that they can be natural..
      I know that in no way shape or for that a bigfoot lives in the Chicago park district...

      Delete
    55. They know the trail cam is something! Thom, if you're a 15 year vet, why aren't you encouraging me? I asked to see your research, I'm willing to learn anything you have to share. What can you share Thom? I have a few videos coming, and one is soooooooooooo controversial, I'm sure your going to have a field day with blasting comments!! But, I'd like to see some explanations, before I get blasted.
      Here's 1st video from today...possible prints?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMGOcXqcPo8

      Delete
    56. Ok, here's the controversial video. Please explain.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2S8yXtRu7E

      Delete
    57. Last vid.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4lQd3CqIvU

      Delete
    58. DS I don't have must worth sharing..most prints I have found ended up being bear (I don't bother doing research where I live) I've heard vocalizations but to be honest...it could have been coyotes..
      I have zero blobsquatch pics...
      Like I said. ..I haven't found much that couldn't be explained..
      I'm not discouraging you at all...keep trying and you may find proof beyond a shadow of a doubt..but for it to be proof...it has to be beyond a shadow of a doubt...
      Just like a murder trial...first you need a body...and then you need proof beyond doubt

      Delete
    59. It's a challenge that's for sure! I will continue to do my best to prove it!

      Delete
  12. Great article Randy.

    I was a fan of TT in the beginning. I un-subbed him many months ago when I felt he was enabling hoaxers like Timbergiant and a couple others.

    He knows exactly what he is doing.

    As soon as he gained more and more Youtube subscribers and views on his videos increased, it went to his head and he lost it. It is unfortunate as IMO he started out with good intentions but he slipped to the shady side which happens to so many others inevitably.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I just love how DS comes to every bigfoot related blog and hijacks it for his BS stories.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That has never happened! In fact Johnny asked if I could discuss my evidence here, and that's what I'm doing.

      Delete
    2. That was the last post.

      You hijacked this post, at least 10 on bigfoot tracker news and at least 5 on bigfoot evidence.

      Mabey you should start your own site.

      Delete
    3. I knew something was wrong, I thought is this guy doing this, to steer the topic away from TT. I've seen this on other sites , we were trying to discuss Timbers hoaxing and the thread was ruined by two characters doing the same. Private message if you are going off topic. I thought 114 comments, this is brilliant, shame about 90 of them are someone talking shit.

      Delete
  14. We'll. don't know what all that last bit was about but I'll try to stop by more often. You fellas have a nice evening. Micheal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mike..some of us are having a debate on one of "the regulars" bigfoot evidence that he has posted elsewhere...
      A lot of us are familiar with each other from similar sites and blogs...
      At times we can get off track from the initial blog topic...

      Delete
  15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MFfrZCHwSs
    Hi DS there appears to be tracks in the snow everywhere, why didn't the BF leave sign when it messed with your trail cam?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The cameras were all messed with in the summer.....I was just showing you the placement of some of the cams.

      Delete
  16. Okay, I've had enough. That guard rail video was awful. Attributing bent I-beams to Bigfoot is a huge stretch of the imagination and I saw no evidence to indicate that Bigfoot bent these. Every single natural reason needs to be examined and dismissed FIRST. I do NOT call this research.
    Bigfoot cross under the overpass? Really? WHERE is the evidence to support this claim?

    The thing in the tree IS a porcupine whether you choose to believe it or not. There are clear images showing this is a porcupine and NO photos showing it's a Bigfoot. Drop the cognitive dissonance already.

    The blurry images of an alleged Bigfoot are likely pareidolia. There is nothing that indicates the images show any Bigfoot. NONE. These are indistinct photos, period. Inconclusive.

    This blog is dedicated to exposing hoaxers and poor evidence. I can no longer sit and be silent on this matter. The evidence is nothing outstanding and proves nothing.

    I'm sorry to sound harsh but seriously, stand back and look at this stuff objectively. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. End of story.

    Keep on trying but please don't try to make something out of nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I said it was controversial. I know they are crossing through here, I found prints, and have witnesses. Randy, how can the front of the guard rail have no damage, but the I-beams are bent, with no hammer damage? The guard rails in this area are all jacked up! I can do another video and show you, but I'll spare ya, unless requested.
      I also said, I don't know what did this Randy, and I will pull the video down if there is an explanation. I know the cop who works the area, and didn't say anything, but just asked if there were car wrecks under that bridge....he said no.

      Delete
    2. Other than the prints, there are animal bones, skulls, spines, all over the hillside, and scat everywhere....no, I did not see BF kill, eat, or poop.
      I got stopped 3x by the game commission, right where I was filming, because that's the front of the game lands.

      Delete
    3. The i-beams were either damaged at installation or in shipment. there is absolutely nothing controversial about that. You saw prints? Were are the photos or cast?

      Animal bones at the edge of game land? Wow that could never happen without a bigfoot present (rolling my eyes here).

      Randy thanks for chiming in and I agree every explanation needs to be considered first before jumping to a conclusion.

      AF

      Delete
    4. Easy bro :-)
      A buddy told me that the I-beams were put in by a machine, that keeps pounding them when the hit rocks, bends the beams. I said, Ok, I have an open mind, and that sounds legit. BUT, I have a few questions! Why don't I see this everywhere if that's the case? I only see it here?? Are the road crews that sloppy? No way that's up-to-code!! Not safe at all...some weren't even attached the guard rail?
      I researched this area for 4 years AF...and it was actually google earth, that let me see the path from the game lands, to the abandoned house, up the hill,(bones and spines right near the path, AF) then under the under pass, then following the creek, up to the orchards and cornfields. Then I went and investigated the printed out version, and it all lined up, unreal what I found.

      Delete
  17. DS maybe with your research you can clarify something for me. We're do Bigfoot sleep? Let's assume we are talking a clan of 4 or 5. Huge hairy smelly beings. I don't buy they move around and sleep in a different location every day. So I imagine the inside of their nest be similar to that of any other large hairy mammal. Wouldn't they return their daily to sleep?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the question. My personal belief is that they only live in caves. All blinds and dens are for hunting. I found what appear to be beds (big coffin size, cut out of the ground, with leaves for comfort, and sticks across the top, for camo) possible nap spot?

      Delete
    2. Thanks DS, are you aware if any of these caves have ever been located?
      It would seem the logical place gather evidence.

      Sorry for shifting off the topic of TT Randy, the buffalo video effort clearly demonstrates that TT is certainly now, if not before playing people for fools.

      I would be very interested if there is a video anywhere that is believable.
      If so maybe post it here for comment.

      Delete
  18. Well DS...find that cave...collect some hair samples...or do a extended stake out. ..Get some solid evidence..good video or photos of an actual animal...
    Seems like you have all the info you need on the location and habits of these beasts...time to gather some hard evidence. ..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pennsylvania is known for our caves. I don't need to find the caves, I know how they mark their hunting and hanging out areas....I'm not bragging, It took me years of research to figure it out. Here's is the video of the area that I saw the 2 BF in the photo (which I know some think is blurry, or bushes) My battery died, but I will film the whole area next week.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJXZMQnG6L4

      Delete
    2. But if you found the caves that Bigfoot lives in couldn't you wait for them to come home and film them properly?

      Delete
    3. but ds if you know all this stuff, why not get a real live bigfoot on film? sounds fishy to me.

      Delete
    4. seems you always come up with pictures of sticks and what not when questioned, you then say "i know where they are" etc etc etc but don't have real proof?

      Delete
    5. Not fishy, you just have to ask me questions to find out more. Just this year, I figured out how they are marking the areas where they hang out in the summer. The markers lead me right to them. It took me years to compare sites, and document everything. I'm 90% sure I can find them, within a 60 yard radius of certain markers (or at least they are hiding within this radius)
      Anon 1:21 The BF are not in this area in the winter, only end of Apr-Oct (depending on the weather) I see fresh breaks all the way up until the first snow, and then all structures, breaks, and prints disappear.
      Anon 9:50, sounds good, but I'm all by myself, and I'm a diabetic, so not smart being out in the woods alone, I can only do so much.

      Delete
  19. This is my first time posting in any blog so this should be fun. I've seen hundreds of bigfoot videos, listened to vocal calls and looked at so called footprints. I have never seen anything that couldn't be explained as an existing animal or a straight up hoax. I do want to say that i wish a bigfoot exists just so there is some unknown still left in this world but the fact is prior to patterson/gimlin bigfoot was based in mainly native american folklore. After that film the sightings went through the roof. They were aspiring film makers. Don't over think things ppl. Its not real. Its not a missing link, it doesn't come from ufo's, and it never has or will be filmed ever. To think this creature who would supposedly have no contact with human culture knows what a trail cam is and can avoid it is laughable. Even the rarest animals in the world are spotted by humans from time to time. Please use common since. Thanks for your time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cryptids of any kind aside, there is PLENTY of things left unknown about this world. To assume otherwise would be ridiculous at best (thats me being extremely generous) as you said. Please use common sense. There now its your first blog post AND first blog burn. Enjoy :)

      Delete
  20. I was you at one time until I encountered a Bigfoot while hunting, all I can tell you is that they exist. On the PG footage, I believe someone would have made a suit by now which looks like the subject in the video. Why hasn't someone done this? They would be just as famous as the footage, so it's not like they don't have incentive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Vegas! Not sure if u saw or responded to my question....how far was your sighting from Blairsville? I hunt Virginia farms game lands off of Rt 217, if u know where that is?

      Delete
    2. The why hasn't someone made a costume argument doesn't hold water I'm sorry.

      I know some film company made one for a documentry a few years back but honestly it didn't look like they tried very hard or the producers gave them 500.00 and said do the best you can.

      The reason nobody's made one is simple....waist of time.

      One day the truth is going to come out about the PG film and I think a lot of footers are going to cry

      Delete
    3. Leroy Blevins did the closest recreation last year I think, and it was good, but not even close to Patty!

      Delete
    4. LOL.... Leroy Blevins is a nutcase in the highest order.

      His party costume looked like a guy in footie pajamas with a ski mask.

      Delete
  21. Show me a better rendition of Patty then.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This has some short clips...it's pretty cool.
    Quick look at the Patterson Bigfoot: http://youtu.be/AQlPAFV6yaI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find the video flawed in so many areas that I literally don't have the time to list its failures.

      Delete
  23. Sorry Vegas, look at the dig break downs on the PG film. You just can't fake things like the hernia on the right thigh, muscular movement through the hair etc. Even Planet of the Apes took up to 8hrs just doing face head and hands make up. Even if Paddy was the last one she was real. BF

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I'm talking about the Thom's video.

      Delete
  24. Thank you to all TT and TGBF fans, you along with these two diabolical con men, you all have helped make a complete mockery, of the subject that many people are passionate about and love, thank you. Those pair at least have a reason for doing this, they're a pair OF " ##### " What on earth is your excuse. I've been telling you all for 17 months now. Thank heavens for Snowalkerprime and RacerX, well done gentlemen (:

    ReplyDelete
  25. The problem with just about all the BF community is that it's a giant Pissing Contest.
    Personally I like TT's take on things although I don't always agree with him. I think he makes it clear that these are only his opinions take it or leave it
    I've had an encounter in SW Oregon along the Rogue river many years ago. I was within arms length of this creature so I had a good look and one hell of a scare I'll never forget, ever. This is why I watch this crap. some makes sense to me some does not. That said however I trust most posters sincerity even if I don't believe it.
    Naturally some are ridiculous and as such are just a waste of time

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You sound like one TT or TGBF fans. Real people just want the truth, not these flat out lying, money grabbing,Egotistical charlatans. You obviously are not a fan of truth. TT and TGBF employs tatics to fool people like you, and it works, whether or not you realise it, you're on. here making excuse's for him. Stop shoring up hoaxers. One diehard TGBF fan said. So what if Jim's a hoaxer, he's lovely, and you're just a hater!!

      Delete
    2. Amen Richard!
      TGBF started off with some interesting stuff, not sure why he hoaxed?

      Delete
  26. Thinker thunder? From what I've seen it appears to be an exceptional..wonderful example of water head Mentality equipped with zero class or originality,.tragically meeting one of the most amazing.,eons old subjects in human history.
    My question is why. Why us? Isn't our paths tough enough without this nonsense?!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Thinker is a bullshit artist and so is TimberGiantBigFoot. Thinker can see that Timbers FANS are nothing more, than dumbass sheeple who need a hero, so if he defends their diabolical insanity, they will become his sheeple too," lets fleece the flock" springs to mind. People in high place's want a mockery made of this subject, that also needs considering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fact that so many gullible sheeple follow these scammers/LIARS is what is truly disturbing.
      TT, Timber Hoaxer, several others all kiss each others asses not because they believe that what they are posting on Youtube is genuine, but because they want the same subscribers to subscribe to their own channel.

      For Timbergiant, Dyer, Sasquatch Ontario, etc. Bigfoot is like "role-playing" or pretending they are hunting for a wild beast in the woods by posting fake videos for gullible viewers and receiving praise from strangers. They become significant online because they may feel insignificant or lonely without the internet.
      They would NOT be filming in the parks, or their local woods and playing pretend otherwise.

      Delete
    2. Excellent comment, well said (:

      Delete
  28. What is the source of the pictures allegedly showing the "Creature In The Giant Sequoias"? Remember, the standard of proof demonstrating hoaxing is the same as for legitimacy. Simply showing a couple photos without context don't cut it. As for Timbergiant Bigfoot's video: you imply hoaxing because you "think he presents questionable videos" and denigrate TT because "According to Thinker, not only is this a Bigfoot, but it's carrying a baby. You can't get more sensational than that." First, this puts forth an opinion and second, an animal carrying its offspring is "sensational"? Last I checked its perfectly consistent with the known behavior of great apes as well as humans. I'm not asserting these videos are authentic but you assert the positive, that they are hoaxes. The burden of proof is upon you to show this unequivocally, something you clearly have not done.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @ Jim Hurlbut..... Are you retarded ? "Creature In The Giant Sequoias" is A Documentary short film https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieamRzJqPgs
    Is that enough proof ?

    ReplyDelete
  30. On the may 1st episode of survivorman bigfoot. About the 50 to 55 minute area he says they went back to the rocks they placed and had heard a woop sound. Behind him as he turns the camera back to himself behind him there is a bigfoot moving very fast with his knees bent its not a cameraman or person.

    ReplyDelete
  31. On the may 1st episode of survivorman bigfoot. About the 50 to 55 minute area he says they went back to the rocks they placed and had heard a woop sound. Behind him as he turns the camera back to himself behind him there is a bigfoot moving very fast with his knees bent its not a cameraman or person.

    ReplyDelete
  32. THINKER THUNKER was RIGHT about ONE THING ! WATCH THIS : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TyyYGKn-U8

    ReplyDelete
  33. THINKER THUNKER was RIGHT about ONE THING ! WATCH THIS : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TyyYGKn-U8

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete